The Hill’s headline reads: “Trump attorney blights Stormy Daniels’s credibility in tempestuous cross-exam.”

The following is taken from the article:

Across three hours of questioning over two days, the defense attorney insinuated Daniels’s work in porn made her ready to cash in. 

You have a lot of experience in making phony stories about sex appear to be real, correct?” Necheles asked Thursday. 

That is among the stupidest questions I’ve seen asked in court and yet it’s the first the Hill highlights as an example of “blighting” her credibility.