The newest Wikileaks release has begun. I actually have very mixed feelings about this. While the public really should have been informed that Saudi donors continue to fund terror even as both Republicans and Democrats genuflect to Saudi leadership (and Saudi tourists remain off the suspect categories even though they accounted for nearly all of the 911 attackers), I do think that the release of information which puts dissidents in danger and tends to discourage candid conversation with other world leaders in the future is detrimental, whether legal. On the other hand, I do think Americans have the right to know that the Chinese government is trying to sabotage American computer systems even as we maintain most favored nation status so the WalMart set doesn’t have to pay living wages to the people who make their crap.
As a legal matter, Wikileaks is safe. It is not unlawful to receive materials which had been confidential. Whoever leaked the materials to them did break the law.
The NY Times, which published the Pentagon Papers so many years ago, defends its decision to publish this leak. I do find their arguments persuasive.
….
Fox News has posted an Onion reference to a fictitious Obama email, but neglected to mention that it is satire. A prank? Manipulation? Oversight? Stupidity?
….
In the wake of some odd homophobic statements by Family Research Council leadership, the Southern Poverty Law Center has added FRC to its list of “hate groups.” FRC President Tony Perkins isn’t happy about it.
….
Despite the largest Republican win in House races ever, RNC head Michael Steele is in trouble again.
….
Okay, I’m a firm believer in the “family-is-off-limits” rule, but Bristol Palin has earned her own attention with this ad. It’s painful to watch due to bad scripting and worse acting, but the main point is that I’m not even sure what the ad is trying to say. Is it promoting abstinence, or safe sex? You tell me.
….
More later.
….
Addendum: The Guardian has much more on the Wikileaks dump.
….
Second addendum: TPM lists its five most astonishing revelations from the Wikileaks documents. I think number 5, the reliance of US foreign policy on blog gossip, is bound to be a source for humorists over the week.
But the number 1 item is probably the most alarming, and that’s that nearly every country in the Middle East has expressed support for a military attack on Iran. That is bound to lead to some yelling and screaming, or worse, in those countries, and probably those leaders will be hesitant to discuss anything with the U.S. in the near future. That’s not good. The downside for this release for peace activists, is that revelations 1, 3, and 4 actually provide political cover for such a bombing, and I suspect that conspiracy theorists will argue that the leak was a deliberate move on the part of hawkish elements in the military with the more embarrassing portions thrown in to give the leak credibility.
In any case, somebody has played a very dangerous game.

11 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 28, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Anonymous
So why can’t Wikileaks be prosecuted for treason?
November 28, 2010 at 5:20 pm
otherguy
Why cant the Candies Foundation be prosecuted for that ad?
November 28, 2010 at 6:20 pm
Dave Kirby
How are these guys getting all this stuff? I too have some serious problems with this shit. I’m sure the dingbats in Iran are enjoying this. Oh and Erik that puter you are sitting in front of is probably Chinese crap. The scary thing is they are building a whole lot more than “junk”. A lot of true blue U.S. brands are made in China. I was up at Sears last week and this guy was really pissed ’cause the Craftsman tool he was looking at was from China. You couple the loss of these products and their jobs with the fact that if the Chinese decided to redeem all our IOUs they’d bankrupt the country. It’s a gnarly problem. Makes one wonder how we got here.
November 28, 2010 at 6:58 pm
Eric Kirk
Dave – I mentioned before that I recently went to Kohl’s, or whichever store is at the south end of the mall. I needed some shoes and some dress socks. I went into the sock section and noticed the “made in China” tag, and out of curiosity searched for an American made sock. Didn’t find any. So in the 15 minutes I could spare, I searched the entire store for an item made in the US to no avail. Not one item of clothing from the US.
November 28, 2010 at 7:25 pm
Bunny
And there you have it.
November 28, 2010 at 8:25 pm
anon
that’s great that all that supposedly secret stuff is being exposed…there is war and violence and suffering behind government secrets…
wiki-leaks rocks!
November 29, 2010 at 9:30 am
Anonymous
my guess is that none of this stuff is very damaging, and i just wonder how much mis-information was stuck in there for release at this time. if the u.s. gov. did not want this info out on the public, it would have been stopped. not just sending a letter from the u.s. lawyer demanding asange not release the documents. if they did not want the info out, asange would not still be living and breathing. what are they really hiding with the release of all this info, and who is asange really working for?
November 29, 2010 at 9:44 am
Anonymous
should have read your entire post. it’s not the hawkish military. it’s the hawkish corporate heads that tell the military what to do. hawkish corporations, america inc, war$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
November 29, 2010 at 10:21 am
Eric Kirk
What can I say? I know that some will go there. The problem is that there really is plenty of information which is prejudicial to those interests. That the neighboring nations are afraid of Iran isn’t that big a revelation that it would take such an elaborate maneuver to get the word out.
November 29, 2010 at 3:07 pm
Wikileaks with enough material to keep the media busy for weeks « Sohum Parlance II
[...] started to discuss it this morning, when TPM listed its top five revelations, but that may be out of date. And we already have a [...]
November 29, 2010 at 3:29 pm
Anonymous
you always salt the goldmine before you sell it.