<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Unconstitutional!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Everything Southern Humboldt and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tra</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oops, wrong thread!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, wrong thread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tra</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guy who came in third (Hagen) seems a bit bitter towards the guy who came in first (Gallegos)…big surprise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy who came in third (Hagen) seems a bit bitter towards the guy who came in first (Gallegos)…big surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jendocino</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jendocino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I think the phrase &quot;that&#039;s unconstitutional&quot; has simply become code for &quot;I disagree.&quot; The rhetoric is so hyperbolic these days, especially with the election right around the corner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think the phrase &#8220;that&#8217;s unconstitutional&#8221; has simply become code for &#8220;I disagree.&#8221; The rhetoric is so hyperbolic these days, especially with the election right around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Nice</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Nice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The part that purist libertarians object to is the United States part of the birthright thing. Just that they would like it to be written people born in California are citizens of California. Citizens of California were not citizens of the &quot;United States&quot; before the 14th as nobody was a citizen of the United States, they were a citizen of whatever state they were a citizen in and their state happened to be part of the United States. That&#039;s the main issue. Mainstream opposition takes this to mean change the 14th in order kick out Guatamalan folks or some other racist shit. But really a purist would want it just to only recognize birthright as a state issue even though its mandated by the republic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part that purist libertarians object to is the United States part of the birthright thing. Just that they would like it to be written people born in California are citizens of California. Citizens of California were not citizens of the &#8220;United States&#8221; before the 14th as nobody was a citizen of the United States, they were a citizen of whatever state they were a citizen in and their state happened to be part of the United States. That&#8217;s the main issue. Mainstream opposition takes this to mean change the 14th in order kick out Guatamalan folks or some other racist shit. But really a purist would want it just to only recognize birthright as a state issue even though its mandated by the republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAN</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pantano is a national disgrace. Like Ollie North before him, he uses the uniform to legitimize his psychopathic cruelty toward other peoples. Sick bastards. More frightening indeed Mitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pantano is a national disgrace. Like Ollie North before him, he uses the uniform to legitimize his psychopathic cruelty toward other peoples. Sick bastards. More frightening indeed Mitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention It’s Unconstitutional! « Sohum Parlance II -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention It’s Unconstitutional! « Sohum Parlance II -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Revolution, scott joachim. scott joachim said: shp: It’s Unconstitutional!: It’s kind of a buzz phrase for conservatives and libertarians when responding to any ... http://bit.ly/9zRcMX [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Revolution, scott joachim. scott joachim said: shp: It’s Unconstitutional!: It’s kind of a buzz phrase for conservatives and libertarians when responding to any &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/9zRcMX" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9zRcMX</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Mielke</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Mielke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. That is, as they say, some sad shit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That is, as they say, some sad shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/its-unconstitutional/#comment-47328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kunsoo1024.wordpress.com/?p=10675#comment-47328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian has a good article on a tea party supported candidate who, in the words of their headline, &quot;killed unarmed Iraqis&quot;.  He&#039;s winning his race for Congress. 

The Constitution is available for reverence, but there&#039;s no reverence for the principles it enshrines.  To be blunt, things are getting more and more frightening.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/26/us-veteran-killed-iraqis-tea-party]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian has a good article on a tea party supported candidate who, in the words of their headline, &#8220;killed unarmed Iraqis&#8221;.  He&#8217;s winning his race for Congress. </p>
<p>The Constitution is available for reverence, but there&#8217;s no reverence for the principles it enshrines.  To be blunt, things are getting more and more frightening.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/26/us-veteran-killed-iraqis-tea-party" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/26/us-veteran-killed-iraqis-tea-party</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
