Just a few items. The only fight left before certification is the one over the absentee ballots which may have been wrongfully rejected. As discussed earlier, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued an odd order mandating that both campaigns must agree on the ballots to be recounted. There are 1,346 absentee ballots which local officials have determined were improperly rejected. Franken wants all of them counted. Coleman, well, I’m not clear on what Coleman wants exactly, except that he doesn’t want certain of the identified ballots opened, and he has introduced more ballots from districts which favor him. It’s all explained, sort of, here. Since it’s unlikely that the campaigns will reach any agreement, further court action seems inevitable even before the certification.
An item of rich irony – among the absentee ballots Coleman opposes is one cast by an elections judge. The basis is that the date next to her signature and the date next to her witness do not match. She insists that they do and that she and her witness were well aware of the law when they signed the envelope. The irony? She says her vote was for Coleman. Will he withdraw his challenge? Probably not, as it would undermine the remainder of his challenges.
Coleman is now accusing election officials of bias.
The Republicans are threatening to fight the seating of Franken should he be certified the winner. Not sure what they can do with at most 41 votes even if they have a legal basis.
Coleman’s hope is to keep close enough after the rejected absentee count in order to get a reversal on the court’s rejection of his duplicate vote argument and hope that makes the difference. It’s a slim hope, but he’s pulling out the stops.

22 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 1, 2009 at 11:05 am
Moviedad
So Erik, is the 50 vote lead final? I am reading that Al Fraken in in the lead by 49 or 50 votes. It would be great if he wins. there are so few real, true, progressives. I use that word, even though I don’t like using the labels given to us by the Corporate name-taggers. You’re a progressive, you’re a liberal, you’re a lefty. all these tired labels are leftovers from the cold-war and before.
I was at a party last night, and I used the word “Anarchists” Jeez, people react as if the bombings of the 1920′s happened yesterday. The propaganda is so complete, that people hate who they’re supposed to hate. Throughout history the big business hatred of any revolutionary group has been maintained and strengthened over the years. Unions have always been portrayed as nothing but organized crime. when it has always been those in power how manipulated the unions by giving concessions to the leaders they want in charge, and refusing to work with those it doesn’t want to have power.
In my neighborhood, if you were in the union, you were in a whole different class of worker. in most cases you owned a home. by the time I joined a union of signmakers in the early 80′s, that particular union had no power whatsoever outside of Vegas, Reno and Atlantic City.
Notice the Longshoreman strike of a couple of years ago in Long Beach. Front page news for weeks, listing all their “outrageous” demands, printing their wages, saying the union is dead, siding with the corporations against them. Then, they win, the unions, every concession they wanted, total victory, and you couldn’t find it anywhere in the media. I finally found out what happened on the web.
So screw the Labelists, I am not a “Progressive” I am a “Equality-ist”, I am not Leftist, I am a: “Fairness-ist.” I am not a communist, I am a: “Family-ist.” I am not an Anarchist, I am an: “American.”
Happy New Year…It’s gonna be fine, in 2009.
January 1, 2009 at 11:44 am
Eric Kirk
50 votes now, not including the absentees they’re arguing about.
January 1, 2009 at 2:10 pm
Bizarro World
Classic. Bush wins an election and demoncrats and libs scream, cry, and whine about it every chance they get. So now the totally unqualified, mentally ill, hateful, lying piece of crap Al Franken blatantly and criminally steals an election but, hey, it’s all good brother. No crack journalistic investigative reporting on the Messiah’s connection with Blago like there would be if they were Republicans. No hypocritical double standards here. Move along.
January 1, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
The labeling has been taken to a whole new level by the right wing extremists ( I get the irony). They have made “liberal” a dirty word in the minds of Joe Sixpack and Betty Winebox. I am personally proud to be a Liberal and a Progressive and a leftist. Bill O’Hannityrush would have you believe that a liberal is a horrible person but hen Jesus was a liberal too. And then us liberals are all of a sudden afraid to call ourselves what we are and should be proud of it. Look what the “Conservatives” have done to the country in the last 14 or more years.
January 1, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Eric Kirk
So now the totally unqualified, mentally ill, hateful, lying piece of crap Al Franken blatantly and criminally steals an election but, hey, it’s all good brother.
So can you elaborate specifically on how Franken is “stealing” the election? Please be specific. George Bush won in 2000 by excluding votes. Coleman is trying to exclude votes, but the Minnesota courts aren’t as obliging as the federal courts. Maybe he’ll have better luck at the federal level.
January 1, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
Señor Bizarro please back up your claims with some references.
Waiting…
January 1, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Eric Kirk
Coleman’s not being very specific either. Maybe they’re saving it for a surprise.
January 1, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Not A Native
Gee Moviedad, sounds like you’re not so much against labels as against people who would assign one to you. You’re perfectly content having a label, as long as its you who’s assigning it.
My take is that your general issue may have more to do with granting and implementing authority and status, which is a necessary obligation for being in a social community and what “labels” serve to facilitate.
January 1, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Nick Bravo
How many recounts have they had? Oh and its only stealing if the republicans win!
*rolls eyes*
January 1, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
Its only stealing if they steal it.
January 1, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Nick Bravo
Democrats (like jews) can do no wrong!
January 1, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
More like Republicans can do no right.
January 1, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Eric Kirk
How many recounts have they had?
One. Mandated by law because the margin was less than one percent.
January 1, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
I’m still waiting for Señor Bizzaro to come up with some kind of evidence or link or SOMETHING to back up his claim(s). As if there are no crack Fox Journalists (oxymoron I know) trying to find some dirt on Obama’s non relationship with Blago. Maybe there are some Fox journalists on crack though. And just what is Señorita Bizzaro referring to when she says; “Al Franken blatantly and criminally steals an election”?
Still waiting.
January 1, 2009 at 7:38 pm
Nick Bravo
Not surprising you resort to name calling greenjeans.
January 1, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Eric Kirk
But the point is, there is no argument. Nothing. All they have is that Coleman was 100 votes ahead after the machine count, and is now 50 votes behind after the indisputably more reliable hand count.
It’s like the old maxim of law. “If you can’t argue the law, argue the facts. If you can’t argue the facts, just argue.”
January 1, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Moviedad
N.A.Native, Spoken like a true Sociologist. I agree. I will label myself. if that’s OK.
January 2, 2009 at 9:44 am
Mr. Greenjeans
“Not surprising you resort to name calling greenjeans.” Said Nick Bravo.
Now that is funny!
By the way, I’m still waiting for a link or SOMETHING to back up his claim(s).
January 2, 2009 at 11:21 am
Eric Kirk
Update
January 3, 2009 at 7:50 am
Mr. Greenjeans
Still waiting.
January 4, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Mr. Greenjeans
Franken Jumps Out to 225-Vote Lead on Strength of Absentee Ballots. “…Franken went on a long winning streak and essentially never looked back.” Hehehe
Oh by the way, still waiting for some kind of evidence from Señor Bizzaro.
January 4, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Eric Kirk
Well, that exceeds the 130 vote boost Coleman was hoping for on the alleged double counting issue.