The one that may be habitable. Well, here’s what it may look like on the planet’s surface! The artist is Karen Wehrstein.
The following description was posted on Daily Kos by a blogger named “Darksyde.”
In this artist’s conception courtesy of our own Karen Wehrstein (Much greater resolution here) the sun would never move as seen from the surface of a tidally locked world, but the sky is an ever-changing show greater than any on earth. Observational data and theoretical models suggest that stars like Gliese 581 might have a dynamic, granular surface and sport enormous starspots. It could be engulfed in perpetual solar storms, seen here as faint plasma arcs and visible surface flares. The star is shown as it might appear above a hypothetical waterworld’s horizon from just sunward of the terminator, distorted and dimmed through a blanket of CO2 five times thicker than our own atmosphere. With less than 7 million miles separating star and planet, Gliese’s solar wind easily plows through the planet’s (presumed) weak magnetic field and slams into the upper atmosphere to produce brilliant displays. Shimmering cascades of what on earth might be called colorful sprites, blue jets, and dazzling aurora mingle so completely with high, wispy clouds as to be virtually indistinguishable. Fat cumulous clouds hang low over the water eerily backlit by the brooding red-dwarf. One lone iceberg represents the assumed many which calve off from the great unseen ice-sheet dominating the planet’s dark side and drift slowly to their eventual destruction on global currents through a deep, planetary ocean of carbonated water. High overhead the barest hint of shorter wavelengths are scattered by the thick air, coloring the zenith a deep twilight blue. Could life evolve in such an alien environment?
Well, if there is a god or “intelligent design,” then how could such beauty be wasted on the absence of life? And why is the red dwarf “brooding?” If nobody’s there, maybe it can be developed for vacation rental space.
Insert Arkley jokes ___________________________.

12 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 28, 2007 at 11:52 pm
Anonymous
‘Well, if there is a god or “intelligent design,” then how could such beauty be wasted on the absence of life?’
Why would it be wasted in the absence of life? I had an argument with an art teacher once. I asserted that art is no more or less art if it is hidden in a cave where it could never be viewed. He sharply disagreed contending art is only art if it observed. I think he was a liberal.
April 29, 2007 at 3:18 am
art for nobody's sake
He was an idiot. But if it was never viewed it must’ve been created by someone who was blind.
April 29, 2007 at 4:12 am
Eric V. Kirk
Okay, so it’s art. It’s also wasted.
April 29, 2007 at 4:30 am
Anonymous
As a species we suck. Our god myths will keep us tied to this plant and at each other’s throats untill we destroy ourselves through war or natural disasters. Even a comet destroying the planet does not have to be the end of humanity if we put our resources to better use than self destruction or personal enrichment. We are at a point where it is feasable to start colonies in space. We made it to the moon and the planets are in reach. Look how far we have come in 400 years. Our knowledge and technology are accelerating and what is a dream today could be reality in a few years. The thing that will anchor us to this planet is religion. The mass phsychosis of religion wastes our resources. One religion wants to bring us back to the stone age, another encourages propogating more humans in a world that cannot support the billions here already. They’re all at fault. Just like the shamans of old, manipulation of the tribe by fear and force. Maybe our next evolutionary change will be the recession of the religion gene. I hope so.
April 29, 2007 at 4:37 am
Eric V. Kirk
We are at a point where it is feasable to start colonies in space.
You first!
April 29, 2007 at 4:46 am
Anonymous
You first!
Isn’t that what Columbus’s buddies told him…..
April 29, 2007 at 7:15 am
Anonymous
You’re a liberal.
April 29, 2007 at 3:57 pm
Anonymous
Hey, religion’s just following orders. It’s like the general who commits the troops–on command. If our rulers were nice, religion would be too. Surely you don’t think God’s in charge of religion?!
April 29, 2007 at 4:57 pm
artslut
I like the dard side
April 29, 2007 at 5:38 pm
factory girl
The most powerful shamans and priests in our culture are the advertising geniuses. Consumption is the equivalent of our cultural religion. There are millions of people buying zillions of products based purely on advertising. They aren’t only buying the actual products but also buying the ideals and myths created within the ad.
Consumption sparks the experience of transcendence in the purchaser. People don’t really have to die to go to heaven. They can just go to the mall.
April 29, 2007 at 10:00 pm
Anonymous
I was raped on this planet in another life!
April 30, 2007 at 2:37 am
Nick Bravo
home…