I’ve held back my comments from the beginning of this controversy, mostly because I didn’t want to fan flames, pour salt into open wounds, or produce any other adverse effect that can be summed up in cliche metaphors. Unfortunately, I did let certain opinions slip through. Having participated in these conflicts in the past, it’s hard to stay objective particularly given the intensity of the experiences.
This has split the community practically down the middle, in almost Biblical fashion setting father against son, servant against, master, yada yada yada. I have good friends on both “sides” (actually, there have been more than two “sides” which has complicated things even more). And for me personally, the end result is sad. I know there are those who are more sanguine, but I really did hope that mediation could turn out a more unifying result.
I also believe that the Board exhausted every reasonable possibility before making this decision. And I know that it was very difficult for at least some of the Board members. But one thing everybody agreed upon even before the negotiations began – the relationship wasn’t working. In some ways, it never has although the money was made and the bills were, until recently, paid. The Mateel had to make a decision that would benefit the center and the community as a whole. Prior boards had visited the possibility of a divorce, but had not acted upon it. Whatever you think of the wisdom thereof, this Board’s decision was courageous. And I hope it was the correct one. In either case, it’s done.
I’m encouraged by these threads and those at the Reggae forum. It appears that people who were “adversaries” are pulling together to make ROR 2007 work, regardless of their opinions of the recent controversies. And as harsh as some of the venting has been, it could be much worse (and may yet worsen).
I also want to echo a sentiment expressed in the threads below. I don’t censor comments for the most part, and I understand the need for some to remain anonymous. My suggestion is that if you must remain anonymous, avoid personal attacks. It’s one thing to express a controversial opinion for which you are afraid of social or other repercussions. It’s quite another to snipe from the cover of anonymity.
In the meantime, I’m grateful for the efforts at unity which currently outweigh the venting. I hope this spirit holds.

20 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 1, 2007 at 2:41 am
Matthew
Nice thoughts, Eric. I think we are faced with a point where the thing to do is to find a way to go forward. We all have a choice between trying to build upon the great things that Carol has accomplished and carry them into the future in a productive manner–or tear them apart and build further acrimony. When the dust settles we’ll all still be in this community –with some relationship shifts–but still the same family.
Let’s see what we can do to make Reggae 2007 work first, and keep future years in mind as we go along.
January 1, 2007 at 5:36 am
Carol Ann
Nice post, Eric. I concur regarding anonymous comments. Thanks! And have a Happy New Year!!!
January 1, 2007 at 2:26 pm
Anonymous
Thank you Eric. Your comments are appreciated.
The amount of energy required to make this transition and deliver a great event to this community is, as most here know, enormous. We can choose to focus on a forward positive direction together or we can create diversions down other pathways and split that energy into directions, MCC feels, are less than productive.
My own feelings, as executive director, is there is precious little energy to waste and looking “backwards”, while the emotions and history need to be acknowledged and respected, will not deliver what it is we all mutually agree upon: Reggae On The River 2007.
Let’s go forward while giving dignity and respect to the past.
Taunya Stapp, Executive Director Mateel Community Center
January 1, 2007 at 3:02 pm
Anonymous
I really hope that this is the last year. The homeless that show up for Reggae and then don’t leave…the pains in the asses demanding free stuff from local restuarants…the damn drugs.
Yeah, I will be glad to see it die. I have my fingers crossed, as do a lot of other people that I know won’t voice their opinion on this.
January 1, 2007 at 6:17 pm
Fred
I was wondering if some of the folks in SoHum aren’t as enamored of ROR as those we’ve heard from here so far.
January 1, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Anonymous
Well IMHO if they don’t address the open and blatant sales of white/brown powders & LSD/Shrooms and get a grip on “I Deal Way” the big bad DEA will come in and shut them down as a continuing criminal conspiracy.
It is soooo DUMB to allow it to continue at a so called “Family Event” !!!!
Mateel B.O.D. are you reading this??
January 1, 2007 at 7:42 pm
steve schmidt
“We can choose to focus on a forward positive direction together or we can create diversions down other pathways and split that energy into directions, MCC feels, are less than productive.”
Taunya Stapp, ED MCC
Pardon me, but that sounds already like; just to pull off ROTR 2007, any remedial actions on items like the above post mentions, and a call for “transparency”, expressed by a number of others already, and my pet peave, wristband proliferation, will be neatly dropped into the dumpheap of “wait’ll next year” and promptly forgotten.
I realize that an awful lot of people have gotten quite used to an awful lot of “perks” for an awful long time. Bad habits, like smoking, drugs, and fast easy cash, are tough habits to break.
But solving these addictions are not unproductive diversions and, I suspect, more people than you realize Ms. Stapp, are going to watching how the Mateel BoD and it’s Executive Director handles them.
January 1, 2007 at 10:03 pm
Anonymous
This is not a “family event” and I seriously wonder why adults think they should expose their children to this. Drugs are openly done down in the pit. The local law enforcement will not go down there, and when they have to, they are treated with hostility from the patrons and the staff.
The open drug deals down there are crazy. I honestly feel that Reggae On The River encourages people to openly defy the laws and do drugs at the concert. I am not saying every one that goes does drugs, but knowing quite a few rich college kids that attend….it is a very big draw. They don’t talk about the music, they talk about getting weed and other drugs and having a fucked up weekend.
Yeah, that sounds like a “family event” to me.
January 2, 2007 at 3:10 am
Rhythmwize
Yeah, it simply amazes me that ROTR has been able to continue after Congress passed that Anti-Raver’s bill a few years ago.
Its seems to me that a festival such as ROTR, with widespread open drug dealing and useage, is exactly what that legislation was all about. I’m clueless as too why the Feds have never intervened.
January 2, 2007 at 6:40 am
Eric V. Kirk
I don’t know about “the pit.” I’ve only attended two ROR festivals, and while I was approached to purchase “magic poptarts” and a few other items, I had no problems bring my son to the children’s area which is quite substantial and drug free. I’ve heard stories about heroin deals, but what I personally witnessed was fairly typical for any youth oriented concert.
Still, the open sales of drugs, particularly hard drugs, should be addressed. The question is how to go about it without declaring martial law.
January 2, 2007 at 4:16 pm
Anonymous
I am curious about what you are refering to as the “pit.”
January 2, 2007 at 9:29 pm
Anonymous
Eric, it can’t be addressed until the staffers quit blocking law enforcement at every entrance/exit point. They tend to “run interference” and try their damndest to slow the officers down from going inside the event.
So unless they change their attitude about the drugs and allow the deputies to go in when needed, it wont change.
Yes, they allow them to go in “when needed” now, but for drug overdoses and rapes. They won’t let them in to walk through and make sure everyone is following the laws and acting like they should.
I hope ROR dies out soon, before the event this year. So does most local law enforcement that has to deal with all of the bullshit that stems from this oh-so-wonderful “family event”
January 2, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Eric V. Kirk
They won’t let them in to walk through and make sure everyone is following the laws and acting like they should.
Then it would be the only non-classical concert on the planet in which there is no pot smoking, and they’d be so caught up snatching away joints and checking ID’s of people drinking beer, the hard-cores (who would most likely be watching for the police) would just shut down whenever they were present. Plain clothes officers willing to let the lesser stuff slide might make a difference, but they’re probably already there anyway. I don’t think it’s necessary to let the uniformed officers wander randomly and impact the climate of the show.
The event organizers simply have to be ready to act on reports of hard drug sales, and immediately turn over any dealers to the police.
Law enforcement is paid very well for the event. I don’t think they share your disdain for the event. It’s a major cash cow for them.
It won’t be dying out anytime soon.
January 2, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Eric V. Kirk
As has been announced here and on the ROR board, they’re in the process of putting together a contract with a new producer. I believe the owner of the company (who is named over at the ROR site – “Boots” somebody?) organizes the Sierra Nevada Festival.
January 2, 2007 at 10:59 pm
Kimba
Boots does not NOT NOT put on the Sierra Nevada Festival
Want to learn about Boots?
Check out this link
http://www.2b1records.com/assets/History.html
Boots has no affiliation with SNWMF.
January 2, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Eric V. Kirk
Oops! Okay, that’s the problem with rumors I guess. Thanx Kimba!
January 3, 2007 at 4:46 am
Anonymous
Eric,
I know for a fact that the law enforcement is not paid as well as you seem to think. It is not a cash cow, and yes they do hate the event and wish it would end.
Have you actually asked any of the deputies down here about their feelings? I have.
January 3, 2007 at 5:43 am
Eric V. Kirk
Anon 8:46 – as a matter of fact, one of the factors leading to the tension between PP and the Mateel has been the law enforcement constantly upping the fees. I’m told that one year the increase was an additional 50 percent from the prior year. It severely cut into the profit margin, and came up in every contract negotiation.
January 3, 2007 at 6:10 am
Anonymous
Kimba,
Thanks for the link to the article on boots.
January 3, 2007 at 10:54 am
Anonymous
Check out some of you/tubes vids on ROTR. And I don’t mean the MCC meeting either.
They’re bringing in blue ziplock kits with a potporie of, pot, coke, acid and other designer drugs in them.
Also, lots of nitrous oxide whipit discards all over the place. THAT’s an epidemic around here.
Biker’s run has been getting a lot of heat on that from MCSD, but so far, LE is mum on ROTR.
Amazing what a little $$ can do to keep ROTR a “cop free zone”. Anon 8:46 is sooo wrong. Eric is right on that one.