Those of us who are opposed to the jihads of Hamas and Hezbollah as well as the excesses of the Israeli responses thereto have lamented the lack of a presence of a Ghandi or MLK figure in the region. There have been such figures, but unfortunately they don’t live very long. There was Anwar Al-Sadat, who negotiated with President Carter’s help a peace between Israel and Egypt that has been sustained for nearly three decades. He was of course assassinated just a couple of years later, and lest we compare him too favorably with the figures above, he was in the process of a crackdown against intellectuals of all stripes at the time. Still, he did make some progressive movement in a very medievalesque climate.
There was another figure – a leader in the PLO – lost in history who might have made a huge difference had he been allowed to live. Even educated folk I know aren’t familiar with him. I read about him during my first year of college, when he was assassinated. His name was Dr. Issam Sartawi. He was killed in Portugal in 1983 while attending a meeting of the Socialist International. I knew a woman who was a hard leftist in most respects, but also profoundly Zionist in defiance of the political culture of UC Santa Cruz at the time. We lived in a communal endeavor together and had already had some very intense arguments about Israel/Palestine. She was a year ahead of me, and had already become very defensive by the time I arrived, on the tail-end of the last Israeli invasion of Lebanon. Sartawi was killed during the spring quarter and I expected indifference based on what seemed to be her blanket rejection of any redeeming qualities of the PLO. Instead she was saddened and asked rhetorically “Why him?”
I would later learn that he was largely responsible for bringing the PLO to the negotiating table with Israel and had received international recognition for his efforts. This took him out of favor with Abu Nudal‘s band of crazies, and they killed him, probably silencing for years whatever moderate figures remained in the PLO at the time.
As a mostly unreconstructed leftist, I don’t often subscribe to what we have referred to as the “great man” theory of history. But I believe there are moments when individuals do make huge differences in the course of history, and there are certain individuals who show that potential. It could be argued that even what is left of the “peace process” between Israel and Palestine would not have been possible without his initial efforts. He made it very clear that economic development of Palestine was a must for enduring peace, commenting in reference to international soccer: “There will be no peace until the team of Israel plays against the team of Palestine – and we win.” A few details of his efforts can be found in the Wikipedia link above.
As noted the link above he also helped to establish the Palestine Red Crescent Society. In 1998, he received recognition within Israel with the creation of the Issam Sartawi Center for the Advancement of Peace and Democracy at Al-Quds University, an Arab University in Jerusalem.
I think it’s safe to conclude that the combination of Arabic heritage and leadership qualities for peace endeavors is not particularly conducive to the perpetuation of any genetic line, and is therefore not being selected for at the moment. That doesn’t mean it won’t happen.

9 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 1, 2006 at 3:00 am
Anonymous
another dead sand nigger
August 1, 2006 at 5:14 am
Eric V. Kirk
You know, I’m going to leave that one where it is. It’s very educational. Thank you.
August 2, 2006 at 2:19 am
Peter
Eric,
(1) There is no history of an independence movement winning its freedom without violence playing a role. This includes Gandhi or MLK. Communal riots played a huge role in a huge role in convincing the British to leave India. In the case of MLK, the civil rights movement could not have achieved desegreation without the use of force by the federal government.
(2) When you say you support nonviolence, do you support tactics like divestment, or at least targeted divestment from companies that support the Israeli occupation? For example, a boycott of Caterpillar?
(3) This article on Ran Hacohen on the Palestinian Gandhi is invaluable:
http://www.antiwar.com/hacohen/?articleid=5796
August 2, 2006 at 5:49 am
Eric V. Kirk
Well, first of all, I’m not a pacifist, and I’m not advocating non-violent resistance per se. I’m advocating against stuffing rockets with ballbearings and shrapnel and lobbing them into heavily populated civilian areas of Israel.
Secondly, I believe that Israel will stop attacking when they are no longer attacked. I believe Israel has the right to exist at this point. And I don’t trust any resistance movement that refuses to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.
Thirdly, I’d first support a boycott of the weapons distributors who sell to both sides of the conflict before I’d worry about tractors.
And lastly, while I believe that some of the Israeli actions are wrong to horrible, they do have a right to defend themselves. But they aren’t teaching their kids to strap themselves with bombs and walk into a dance club of their peers to kill everybody and themselves. I find it very difficult to side with people who will do that.
That’s why I’d like to see someone like Sartawi assume leadership. If Sartawi had lived and risen to run Palestine, they would have their independence now – I’m convinced of it.
The irony is, Israel’s actions are probably going to strengthen Hezbollah, and a destabilized Lebanon is not in Israel’s best interest. As I said in an earlier post, Hezbollah played Israel well.
August 2, 2006 at 5:51 am
Eric V. Kirk
Thanx for the link by the way. I’ll check it out.
August 2, 2006 at 10:26 am
Steve Lewis
When one compares the reports of the Western press with reports coming from Palestinians and Lebanese themselves one sees a great difference. Israeli supporters are not told of the IDF targeting children for example but the figures confirm the four or five Palestinian children who die for every Israeli child. The reports of Israeli oppression of Pals that I’ve seen would be appropriate for people living under Nazi occupation.
And in all my conversations with Arabs they are all agreed that Israelis can be characterized as people who don’t care about anyone else but themselves, the Jewish “Light of the Gentiles” is a sick joke.
I’m sorry, but Israel will only continue to exist through outside U.S. support as a puppet state that pulls the U.S. foreign policy political strings in Washington D.C. In other words, Israel faces the Afrikaaner fate as soon as the U.S. joins with Europe in condemning a racist rogue state regime.
August 2, 2006 at 8:50 pm
Anonymous
Tractors that run over American peace activists.
August 2, 2006 at 9:00 pm
Eric V. Kirk
I doubt that’s what Caterpiller had in mind when they sold them. I mean, do you think the IDF went to them and said, “Which tractor do you recommend for running over American peace activists?”
August 3, 2006 at 12:55 am
Steve Lewis
Look at the tractors. They’re armored war machines specifically designed for Israelis to crush Palestinian homes and anyone in the way.