Rush Limbaugh is in trouble again. Apparently he was stopped in an airport because he possessed a bottle of prescription medicine that was in his physician’s name (for privacy) rather than his and detained for three hours. The fact that it wasn’t in his name isn’t the problem. The problem is that under the terms of his probation-that-we-aren’t-supposed-to-call-”probation,” he’s supposed to clear all prescription drugs with his non-probation officer. Another round for the late-night comedians.
Photo from MYDD.
Update: Just borrowed the following Al Franken line from Tenzil Kem, who has posted here a couple of times.
“From what I understand, if you cut out all the passages in the Bible where Jesus talks about the poor, about helping out the least among us, you’d have the perfect container to smuggle Rush Limbaugh’s drugs in.”
…..
In a letter to the Eureka Reporter one William Langely is worried that if the Arkleys won’t buy the balloon track, nobody will. He says that Arkley wants to make it a “very beautiful place.”
Meanwhile, local historian Ray Hillman would like to see the Balloon Track preserved as a “cultural resource.”
And Times Standard columnist notes that tensions are high on the Eureka City Council over the Balloon Tract, particularly between Chris Kerrigan and Jeff Leonard.
Note also that the TS says “tract” while the ER says “track.” As a rural SoHumer so confused by those big city politics up there, can somebody tell me which paper has it right?
…..
Once again, 3 Strikes is under some negative scrutiny, as the governor pushes for more bonds to build even more prisons to accomodate the increased inmate population. Cited in the Calitics article linked above are the following points:
According to a 2004 report, 3 strikes accomplishes very little but costs a great deal. A summary of the 3 part report that the Justice Policy Institute Published:
1. 3 Strikes has significantly contributed to an increase in California’s prison population. (Still Striking Out)
2. Nearly two thirds of the second or third strikers were incarcerated for nonviolent crimes.
3. California had four times as many people incarcerated under Three Strikes as the other 21 Three Strikes states for which there were data.
4. There was no substantial link between the use of Three Strikes and declines in crime.
5. 3 Strikes disproportionately impacts African-Americans and Latinos on a statewide basis. (Racial Divide)
In fact, according the article, there are now 3 times more black men in prison than in college. Basically, many conservatives – the same people who would join the tax posse in opposing bonds for schools or libraries – will vote to spend exhorbitant amounts of money to build even more prisons in the state which has the highest percentage of its citizens behind bars – a reality that reflects the rule of conservatives thanks to Orange County bloc voting for about 15 years.
This issue brings new meaning to the phrase “if you build it, they will come.”
…..
And the Confusion Hill bypass construction is finally under way!
…..
The Redwood Times also features a nice story on the latest business venture of Holly Sweet and Jill McClure.
…..
Robert Scheer of the San Francisco Bay Guardian revives a decades old story about journalists who were charged with sedition for alleging that the US military used germ warfare in Korea. The surviving member of the group still believes it’s true. The case was dismissed because the prosecutor misunderstood a basic element of sedition law. The story was revived again a couple of decades later after the journalist using the Freedom of Information Act squeezed some interesting documents from the government. A fascinating story either way.
I wonder though if this is the same Robert Scheer who once lobbied Pete Seeger to back off of supportive statements about Solidarity, the Polish Trade Union on the basis that it was the creation of a CIA plot. Stalinism isn’t dead yet.
…..
And the librarians still have it in for President Bush.
…..
My wife is watching the news and just informed me that Jim Steinberg will be stepping down as Public Defender. I assume it’ll be the hot topic in our competing dailies tomorrow morning.


11 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 28, 2006 at 1:31 pm
Anonymous
I wonder how many of those in favor of the 3 strikes law own stock in private and public prisons?
Prisons are becoming a source of cheap labor, china’s been doing it for years, why shouldn’t we? Problem is, how do you get obedient non-violent people into the prison labor pool? answer….
June 28, 2006 at 2:28 pm
Fred
“TS says “tract” while the ER says “track.”.
I went through the subject off and on some time ago on my blog.
I actually wrote Glenn F-S at the ER and mentioned the discrepency. Like Glenn wrote back (and I remember this which is part of why I made an issue of it) the TS used to use tracT when he worked there. It changed shortly after he left.
I wrote the TS and they said it was supposed to be tracK and they were sticking with it.
Controversy ensued with the TS eventually making the issue their online poll question. I believe tracT won, which is presumebly why TS uses tracT now. Oddly enough, ER is now the one using TracK, probably just as a way of being different from the TS.
I maintained it should be tracT, as it references a tracT of land. Others say it should be tracK because of the balloon shaped tracK on the property. Well, we’re not talking about developing the railroad tracks, we’re talking about developing a tracT of land.
Whatever. After tracT won the TS poll, I got to thinking, “who cares what people call the Balloon Tract…”.
After I mentioned that on my blog, Hank Sims suggested maybe I had buyer’s remorse now that the issue was kind of settled. Perhaps. Maybe it just didn’t seem so important after all the fuss I made about it.
June 28, 2006 at 3:50 pm
Bitxxx
Historically it has been Track… here and elsewhere. Of course as Fred mentioned that refers to the shape of the railroad track but pretty much everywhere (and there are lots of em) the parcel that the track sits on is also referrred to as Track.
June 28, 2006 at 4:47 pm
Eric V. Kirk
Well, just so long as the difference doesn’t represent a political/ideological divide – as in Fox News’ insistance in using the term “homicide bomber” instead of “suicide bomber.”
June 28, 2006 at 5:42 pm
Tom
So — doesn’t that make it the Baloon Track Tract?
June 28, 2006 at 5:57 pm
Anonymous
they are homicide bombers, eric, in case you haven’t noticed, they kill innocent people. It is a more accurate, less forgiving, less whitewashing, term. They murder people like you and your family who are doing nothing more than eating out at a local pizzaria.
June 28, 2006 at 7:17 pm
Fred
Bit wrote: “Historically it has been Track… here and elsewhere.”.
When I moved up here back in ’73 I believe, at least the Times Standard, referred to it as Tract. I don’t know that I would have made a fuss over it if they hadn’t changed to track (apparently after Glenn F-S left the T-S).
June 28, 2006 at 8:21 pm
Anonymous
I wince when I hear the “Fox News” people use the pleonastic term “homicide bombers.” What is distinctive about current terrorist tactics is not the “homicidal” nature of them (that’s as old as the hills) but the self-immolating aspect.
June 28, 2006 at 10:09 pm
Anonymous
anonymous 10:57: See. It’s like this. Homicide means murder. So any use of a bomb for the purpose of killing is “homicide bombing.” What distinguishes certain terrorists is that they take themselves along with their victims. This is a particularly dangerous type of “homicide bomber.” Fox News has no terminology to distinguish.
A homicide bomber who uses a car bomb, or drops one from a plane, or other delivery system may also kill innocents. Or they may kill non-innocents. The language doesn’t distinguish.
And the emotional appeal of your post precisely betrays the lack of objectivity in the reporting. It’s editorializing right in the language.
June 28, 2006 at 10:15 pm
Anonymous
Why don’t those damned librarians leave the president alone?!!!!
June 29, 2006 at 2:43 am
Eric V. Kirk
anon 10:57 – I’m with anon 3:09. I’m not sure what Fox News’ rationale is on this – as if the term “suicide bomber” somehow creates the impression of moral elevation or something. The Unibomber was a homicide bomber. He was not a suicide bomber.
What’s more is that Fox reporters have actually been disciplined for failing to use the management preferred term. That’s like mandatory editorialization in every story – and I view it as something out of Orwell.